Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting
03/08/2007 - Baltimore, MD (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - With Jamal Lewis out of the picture, the Baltimore Ravens completed a trade on Thursday with the Buffalo Bills to obtain the rights to running back Willis McGahee.
The trade is pending a physical that is likely to take place on Friday. The Ravens will send three draft picks, two in this year's draft and one in 2008, to the Bills in exchange for the versatile tailback.
"This is a runner who can make people miss and has the explosion and speed to take it the distance," said Baltimore general manager Ozzie Newsome. "He also has the power and size to run inside. He's a viable receiver out of the backfield and is a good pass blocker, not something every back can do. He also plays physical and with toughness, which are things we pride ourselves on here."
McGahee, a late first round pick in the 2003 draft, rushed for 990 yards and six touchdowns in 14 games last year for Buffalo. In his two seasons before his 2006 campaign, McGahee ran for a combined 2,375 yards and 18 touchdowns. The Miami-Florida product didn't play in his rookie season due to a knee injury suffered in a BCS Championship loss to Ohio State.
"Way to go Ozzie!" said Ravens head coach Brian Billick. "We're getting a dynamic back who has the potential to diversify our running game. We've studied him, and he brings the same passion and preparation that is common to Miami players, like our Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. Getting a player as good as Willis is another example of how Ozzie and his department size up the market and use our resources well."
Baltimore cut Jamal Lewis on February 28th in hopes of re-signing him to a less expensive contract. Lewis, however, signed a one-year deal with divisional-rival Cleveland on Wednesday.
<< United's Silvestre suffers dislocated shoulder
Manchester, England (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - English Premier League's Manchester
United learned that defender Mikael Silvestre suffered a dislocated to his
right shoulder in their 1-0 Champions League win over Lille, Wednesday.
The injury
<< Spring Training Preview: NL Central
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The St. Louis Cardinals overcame a mediocre regular season
a year ago and backdoored their way into a National League Central crown.
Their slump down the stretch, though, did not carry into the postseason, as
they got hot at
<< Red-hot Canucks attempt to tame Coyotes
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The scorching Vancouver Canucks seek to maintain their
grasp on first place in the Northwest Division when they kick off a three-game
road trip tonight with an encounter with the lowly Phoenix Coyotes.
Vancouver has won th
<< Falling Stars try to avoid the Blues
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Dallas Stars try to end a winless spell during the
month of March when the struggling squad visits the Scottrade Center tonight
for a battle with the St. Louis Blues.
Dallas has dropped each of its first three games in
Rams agree to terms with TE McMichael >>
St. Louis, MO (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The St. Louis Rams have agreed to terms with
free agent tight end Randy McMichael on a three-year contract.
McMichael, who released by the Dolphins on Monday, hauled in 62 passes last
season for 640 yard
Boston's Szczerbiak undergoes ankle surgery >>
Boston, MA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Boston Celtics forward Wally Szczerbiak
underwent successful surgery on his left ankle Thursday.
The procedure was performed by team physician Dr. Brian McKeon at New England
Baptist Hospital.
Szcze
Georgetown jumps out early, holds on late to beat Villanova >>
New York, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Roy Hibbert scored 14 points and Jeff Green
added 12, as ninth-ranked Georgetown used a dominant opening half and held on
for a 62-57 victory over Villanova in the quarterfinals of the Big East
Tournam
Toldeo tops Eastern Michigan, advances to MAC semifinals >>
Cleveland, OH (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Justin Ingram scored 14 points and added
eight rebounds and six steals to lead Toledo to a 62-54 victory over Eastern
Michigan in the Mid-American Conference Tournament quarterfinals at Quicken
Loans A
Work left to do: Villanova, Syracuse, DePaul, West Virginia, Providence
Notre Dame and Louisville appear to have done enough to make the move, so we'll make them locks. The Cardinals, despite a modest RPI, are trending way up and have clinched at least a tie for third in the Big East, which should be more than enough with their pair of big road wins. Villanova got back to .500 and gets back to more solid footing. Syracuse got a very important road win and crippled a fellow contender in the process. West Virginia's fate could be in its hands Tuesday at Pitt.
Work left to do:
Villanova [18-9 (7-7), RPI: 21, SOS: 5] Pounded Rutgers to get back to .500. If Cats can get their last two (at UConn, vs. Syracuse), that should be enough with strong computer numbers and a host of wins away from The Pavilion. The Cats have beaten Texas and swept the Big 5 (never easy in Philly), but have a couple of losses to bubble teams (Xavier, Drexel), too. I still think they'll be OK, possibly even at 8-8.
Syracuse [20-8 (9-5), RPI: 53, SOS: 62] History says 10 wins will be plenty, but it might be hard for the Orange to get that last one with a final two vs. G'town, which is trying to win the league title, and at Villanova, which will be desperate for a W. The relative lack of nonconference heft and the weak computer numbers are still concerns, but the Orange have won four in a row and got a very, very big win at Providence on Saturday.
DePaul [16-12 (8-7), RPI: 54, SOS: 18] Beat Cincy and should get past South Florida to get to 9-7, but then what? They have beaten Kansas and Cal (right after the DeVon Hardin injury) earlier this season, but also have lost to Bradley and Purdue, among others. They'll likely need a couple of BE tourney wins, too, but we'll see ...
West Virginia [19-7 (8-6), RPI: 58, SOS: 125] The game at Pitt on Tuesday night could decide the Mountaineers' fate (barring a deep tournament run). They can still get to 9-7 in the Big East without it by beating Cincinnati, but the nine wins would be against UConn, Villanova, St. John's, South Florida, DePaul, Rutgers, Seton Hall twice and the Bearcats. Beating bubble foes is fine, but where's the beef? Outside of beating PG-less UCLA in nonconference play (still a top quality win), there's not a lot to fall back on (besides maybe NC State). WVU vs. Syracuse would be an interesting debate, as the teams don't play in the Big East regular season. WVU has the best win, but Cuse has played the much better schedule.
Providence [17-10 (7-7), RPI: 70, SOS: 33] The Friars likely saw their at-large hopes die at home in the four-point loss to Syracuse, barring an unexpected run to the Big East semis or more. The RPI, bad already, won't be helped by playing St. John's and South Florida in the final two league games.
For more March Madness odds go to MySportsbook.com
For more College Basketball betting lines go to BettingExpress.com
To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com - this sportsbook accepts credit cards.
In any football or basketball game (the main sports that use point spreads) there are two teams playing against each other.
Those teams, though, are rarely exactly evenly matched – meaning that typically one team has a better chance than the other to win the game. If bettors were allowed to bet on who was simply going to win the game, smart ones would obviously bet on the better team (likely winning more than 50% of the time in the process).
If winning were that easy the Las Vegas and online sportsbooks would stop taking any bets! This is where the point spread comes in: the basic function of the point spread is to balance the likelihood of each team “winning” by adjusting the final score by the point spread. After this adjustment is made you get the Against The Spread result (ATS result for short).
Let’s look at Super Bowl XXXIX, New England Patriots vs. Philadelphia Eagles. Most people believed the defending champ Patriots to be the better team – so if betting were simply based upon which team would win the game, an uneven majority of people would have wagered on New England. But, by using the point spread, the bookmakers adjusted the terms of the bet, evening the proposition so about half the people believed the Pats to be the smart bet, while the other half considered Philly to be the smart bet.
New England Patriots -7 vs. Philadelphia Eagles
The better team, called the Favorite, is expected to win the game and must “give” or “lay” points to the weaker team. The favorite is listed with a minus sign and the number of points they are favored by (e.g., New England -7)
In the case of our example, New England must not only win the game, but they must win by more than 7 points for Pats bettors to have a winning ATS result. An Eagles bettor wins his bet either if:
There was also the possibility that the final score could land exactly on the spread number (for example, the Pats winning 28-21 when -7), which is called a “push” or “no action” and a refund is then issued to bettors of both teams.
The same game with the same point spread can be considered from the weaker team’s perspective: The Underdog (Philly in the case of our example) is not expected to win the game and online football betting thus receives or “gets” points given by the stronger team. When a game is stated from the underdog’s perspective the team is listed with a plus sign and the number of points they are underdogs by:
Philadelphia Eagles +7 vs. New England Patriots
Keep in mind that Philadelphia +7 and New England -7 is the same point spread on the same game, simply stated differently. The first is from the underdog’s perspective; the later is from the favorite’s.
Not a must, but for some a mathematical approach is insightful. You can determine the ATS winner by either:
Let’s look at the actual result of Super Bowl XXXIX: New England 24 Philadelphia 21
The favorite, New England, won the game but not by more than the point spread they were favored by (7), so the ATS result was a LOSS for Pats bettors.
Looking at it from the underdog’s perspective, Philly did not win the game, but they lost by less than the point spread (7), so the ATS result was a WIN for Eagle bettors.
Mathematically considered, 24 for the favorite Pats minus 7 equals 17, which is less than the 20 the Eagles scored, so the underdog Eagles win the ATS result (or you could figure 20 plus 7 equals 27 for the Eagles, which is more than 24 for the Pats).
Emily’s boyfriend understood the point spread and wagered $100 on the Eagles at +7. The Eagles may not have gotten a Super Bowl ring, but since they won the ATS result Emily’s boyfriend cashed his bet – giving him money to take her out to a nice dinner.
And now hopefully you understand how to read point spreads, putting you one step closer to joining the fun of sports betting.
To visit this internet sportsbook go to MySportsbook.com for all your football betting and World Series odds.
Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting